POTENTIAL NEUROENDOCRINE INDICATORS OF CHRONIC STRESS
As mentioned above, all physiological systems that respond to stressors also have important day-to-day functions, so it can be difficult to distinguish between normative fluctuations, acute (but healthy) stress responses and chronic stress responses associated with deterioration of health.
Absolute levels of hormones or immune parameters are not good indicators of stress when used alone, however, there are two potentially promising indicators that may be more informative.3.1 Dampened fluctuations in glucocorticoids
There is increasing evidence from the medical literature that patterns of GC expression may be more indicative of an individual’s condition than absolute GC concentrations. For example, in humans the amplitude of circadian fluctuations in GCs is dampened in several psychiatric conditions or situations associated with chronic stress (Fries et al. 2009). There is also evidence that dampened fluctuations in GCs across the oestrous cycle are associated with reproductive failure (Fanson and Parrott 2015). In female Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) that bred successfully, there was a peak in GCs associated with ovulation, followed by a pronounced decrease in GCs (Keeley et al. 2012). However, in females that mated but did not successfully produce pouch young, the ovulatory peak in GCs was delayed by ~4 d and the subsequent decrease was dampened. Therefore, monitoring patterns of GC secretion rather than absolute concentrations may provide more insight into when an animal is experiencing chronic stress.
3.2 Ratio of cortisol to corticosterone
There is some evidence that the ratio of cortisol to corticosterone may provide an index of chronic stress. The adrenal glands produce multiple GCs, but there is typically one ‘dominant’ GC produced in higher concentrations (Hancock 2010). This dominant GC varies across species; in most mammals the dominant GC is cortisol.
The other adrenal products are generally ignored, either because they are assumed to be less biologically active or because their concentrations are assumed to correlate with that of the dominant GC. However, there is increasing evidence that the expression of different adrenal GCs is independently regulated (Hancock 2010). Furthermore, there is some evidence that chronic stress can cause a change in which GC is predominantly produced (Kass et al. 1954; Llano et al. 1982). In short-beaked echidnas (Tachyglossus aculeatus), corticosterone was the dominant GC in ‘control’ animals and in those exposed to a short-term stressor (Weiss et al. 1979). However, in echidnas exposed to a long-term stressor, cortisol became the dominantGC.Theusefulnessofthecortisol:corticosterone ratio as an indicator of chronic stress has been largely unexplored; however, if validated, this method has the advantage that only a single sample would be required to assess an animal’s ‘stress cl'jlικ'.Table 8.1. Summary of published studies using non-invasive (faecal and urinary) glucocorticoid measures in Australian mammals
Population type (Pop) is managed care (MC) or free-ranging (FR), which includes wild animals that were temporarily confined and animals in large, naturalistic enclosures. ‘Sex' indicates whether the study included only females (F), only males (M), or both sexes (B). Focus of the study briefly summarises the focus of the study ('Methodological' = testing some aspect of sample collection or storage; 'Descriptive' = describing normative fluctuations in GCs (not necessarily stress-related differences)).
| Species | Substrate | Pop | Sex | Biological validation | Focus of study | ||
| Short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) | Faeces1 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | ||
| Numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus) | Faeces2 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Descriptive | ||
| Faeces3 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | |||
| Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) | Faeces4 | MC | F | Yes - ACTH | Reproduction | ||
| Faeces3 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | |||
| Faeces5 | MC, FR | B | Previous | Descriptive | |||
| Western quoll (Dasyurus geoffroii) | Faeces6 | FR | B | Yes - Capture and transfer | Reintroduction | ||
| Fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata) | Faeces7 | MC | F | Yes - Social manipulation | Handling intensity | ||
| Greater bilby (Macrotis lagotis) | Faeces8 | MC | B | Previous | Descriptive | ||
| Faeces9 | MC | B | Previous | Methodological | |||
| Faeces10 | MC, FR | B | Yes - ACTH | Descriptive | |||
| Faeces3 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | |||
| Southern brown bandicoot (Isodon obesulus) | Faeces11 | FR | B | No | Environment | ||
| Southern long-nosed bandicoot (Perameles nasuta) | Faeces11 | FR | B | No | Environment | ||
| Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) | Faeces12 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | ||
| Faeces13 | FR | B | Previous | Environment | |||
| Faeces14 | MC | B | No (failed) | Validation | |||
| Faeces15 | MC, FR | B | Yes - ACTH | Handling | |||
| Faeces16 | FR | B | Previous | Environment | |||
| Faeces3 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | |||
| Faeces17 | MC | B | Previous | Visitor encounter | |||
| Faeces18 | FR | B | Previous | Land use | |||
| Faeces19 | FR | B | Previous | Rehabilitation | |||
| Faeces20 | FR | B | Previous | Rehabilitation | |||
| Faeces21 | MC | B | Yes - Cortisol injection | Validation | |||
| Faeces22 | MC | B | Previous | Descriptive | |||
| Faeces23 | MC | B | Previous | Methodological | |||
| Faeces24 | FR | B | Previous | Methodological | |||
| Faeces25 | FR | B | Previous | Joey rehabilitation | |||
| Northern hairy-nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus krefftii) | Faeces3 | MC | F | Yes - Transfer | Validation | ||
| Southern hairy-nosed wombat (L. latifrons) | Faeces26 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Handling | ||
| Faeces27 | MC | B | Previous | Methodological | |||
| Urine28 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | |||
| Faeces3 | MC | F | Yes - Capture and exam | Validation | |||
| Urine29 | MC | M | Previous | Descriptive | |||
| Common wombat (Vombatus ursinus) | Faeces30 | FR | B | No | Sarcoptic mange | ||
| Mountain pygmy possum (Burramys parvus) | Faeces3 | MC | B | Yes - Mating introductions | Validation | ||
| Common brush-tailed possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) | Urine31 | MC | B | No | Methodological | ||
| Faeces32 | FR | B | Yes - ACTH | Rehabilitation | |||
| Yellow-bellied glider (Petaurus australis) | Faeces3 | MC | M | Yes - Transfer | Validation | ||
| Species | Substrate | Pop | Sex | Biological validation | Focus of study | ||
| Sugar glider (P. breviceps) | Faeces33 | FR | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | ||
| Krefft's glider (P. notatus) | Faeces34 | FR | F | Yes - Capture | Light pollution | ||
| Honey possum (TarsIpes rostratus) | Faeces35 | FR | B | Yes - Handling | Reproduction | ||
| Woylie (BettongIa penicillata) | Faeces36 | FR | B | No | Immune function | ||
| Faeces37 | FR | B | No | Descriptive | |||
| Faeces3 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | |||
| Faeces38 | FR | B | No | Translocation | |||
| Faeces39 | FR | B | No | Bushfire | |||
| Faeces40 | FR | B | PrevIous | Translocation | |||
| Eastern bettong (B. gaimardi) | Faeces41 | FR | B | PrevIous | Reintroduction | ||
| Faeces3 | MC | M | Yes - Transfer | Validation | |||
| Gilbert's potoroo (Potorous gilbertii) | Faeces42 | MC, FR | B | No | Reproduction | ||
| Long-nosed potoroo (P. tridactylus) | Faeces3 | MC | M | Yes - Transfer | Validation | ||
| Eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus) | Faeces43 | MC | B | PrevIous | Zoo visitors | ||
| Faeces3 | MC | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | |||
| Faeces44 | FR | B | PrevIous | Land use | |||
| Western grey kangaroo (M. fuliginosus) | Faeces3 | FR | B | Yes - ACTH | Validation | ||
| Red kangaroo (Osphranter rufus) | Faeces43 | MC | B | PrevIous | Zoo visitors | ||
| Tammar wallaby (Notamacropus eugenii) | Faeces45 | MC | colspan=2 bgcolor=white>FYes - Transfer and isolation | Validation | |||
| Faeces46 | FR | F | PrevIous | Sex allocation | |||
| Bridled nail-tailed wallaby (Onychogalea fraenata) | Faeces47 | FR | B | Yes - Capture | Reproduction | ||
| Greater stick-nest rat (LeporIllus conditor) | Faeces48 | MC, FR | B | Yes - Capture | Translocation | ||
| Fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat (Melomys cervinipes) | Faeces49 | MC, FR | B | Yes - Behavioural testing | Problem solving | ||
| Black flying-fox (Pteropus alecto) | Urine50 | FR | Unk | Yes - Capture | Descriptive | ||
| Grey-headed flying-fox (P. poliocephalus) | Urine50 | FR | Unk | No | Descriptive | ||
| Faeces51 | FR | B | Yes - Entanglement | Descriptive | |||
| Little red flying-fox (P. scapulatus) | Urine50 | FR | Unk | No | Descriptive | ||
| Spectacled flying-fox (P. conspicillatus) | Urine50 | FR | Unk | No | Descriptive | ||
| Dugong (Dugong dugon) | Faeces52 | FR | B | Yes - Healthy vs unhealthy | Descriptive | ||
| Leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) | Urine53 | Unk | Unk | No | Descriptive | ||
| Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellII) | Urine54 | FR | B | No | Methodological | ||
| Bottlenose dolphin (TursIops truncates) | Faeces55 | MC | B | Yes - Megestrol acetate | Descriptive | ||
| Common killer whale (OrcInus orca) | Faeces56 | FR | B | Yes - Stranding | Environment | ||
| Faeces57 | MC | B | Yes - Restraint | Validation | |||
| Faeces58 | MC | B | PrevIous | Descriptive | |||
| Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeanglIae) | Faeces59 | FR | B | Yes - Entanglement | Validation | ||
| Southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) | Faeces60 | FR | B | Yes - Stranding | Neurotoxin | ||
| Blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) | Faeces61 | FR | F | Yes - Pregnancy | Validation | ||
1Russell etal. 2022; 2Hogan etal. 2012; 3Fanson etal. 2017; 4Keeley etal. 2012; 5Florent etal. 2023; 6Jensen etal. 2019; 7Swinston etal. 2020; 8Narayan etal. 2012; 9Evans etal. 2013; 10Narayan etal. 2014; 11Dowle etal. 2013; 12Davies etal. 2013a; 13Davies etal. 2013b; 14Johnston etal. 2013; 15Narayan etal. 2013; 16Davies etal. 2014; 17Webster etal. 2017; 18Narayan 2019; 19Narayan and Vanderneut 2019; 20Charalambous etal. 2021; 21Santamaria etal. 2021a; 22Santamaria etal. 2021b; 23Santamaria etal. 2021c; 24Pahuja and Narayan 2023b; 25Pahuja and Narayan 2023a; 26Hogan etal. 2011; 27Descovich etal. 2012; 28Du etal. 2017; 29Du etal. 2018; 30Sengupta 2019; 31Weiss and McDonald 1966; 32Cope etal. 2022; 33Scheun etal. 2019; 34Dimovski etal. (In press); 35Oates etal. 2007; 36Hing etal. 2016a; 37Hing etal. 2016b; 38Hing etal. 2017b; 39Hing et al. 2017a; 40Page etal. 2019; 41Batson etal. 2017; 42Stead-Richardson etal. 2010; 43Sherwen etal. 2015; 44Brunton etal. 2020; 45McKenzie and Deane 2005; 46Schwanz and Robert 2014; 47Moore etal. 2015; 48Williams-Kelly etal. 2023; 49Rowell etal. 2022; 50McMichael etal. 2014; 51Parry-Jones etal. 2016; 52Burgess etal. 2013; 53Hogg and Rogers 2009; 54Constable etal. 2006; 55Mercera etal. 2021; 56Ayres etal. 2012; 57Steinman etal. 2020; 58Steinman and Robeck 2021; 59Hunt etal. 2019; 60D'Agostino etal. 2022; 61Valenzuela-Molina etal. 2018