CHAPTER MENU
| Energy, 829 | Encumbrance, 849 |
| Energy Systems, 830 | Substitution, 850 |
| Maintenance, 831 | Conclusions Concerning Dry Matter, 850 |
| Environment, 831 | General Ration Balancing Considerations for Goats, 850 |
| Activity, 832 | Zero Grazing, 850 |
| Lactation, 832 | Forage Quality, 851 |
| Growth and Weight Gain, 832 | Silage, 851 |
| Gestation, 832 | Palatability, 852 |
| Protein, 832 | Body Condition Scoring, 852 |
| Protein Systems and Requirements, 833 | Apparent Starvation in the Face of Plenty, 853 |
| Milk Urea Nitrogen, 834 | Feeding Pregnant Goats, 853 |
| Urea Toxicosis, 834 | Abortion, 854 |
| Fiber, 835 | Pregnancy Toxemia, 854 |
| Vitamins, 836 | Parturient Paresis (Milk Fever), Hypocalcemia, 858 |
| Vitamin A, 836 | Feeding Lactating Goats, 859 |
| Vitamin D, 837 | Lactation Curves, 860 |
| Vitamin E, 837 | Lactational Ketosis, 860 |
| B Vitamins, 838 | Indigestion and Rumen Acidosis, 861 |
| Major Minerals, 838 | Enterotoxemia, 863 |
| Calcium, 839 | Milk Fat Depression, 864 |
| Phosphorus, 840 | Feeding Newborn Kids, 864 |
| Magnesium, 840 | Colostrum, 864 |
| Potassium, 841 | Hypothermia and Hypoglycemia, 865 |
| Salt, Sodium Chloride, 841 | First Weeks, 865 |
| Sulfur, 841 | Floppy Kid Syndrome, 866 |
| Trace Minerals, 842 | Feeding Growing Kids, 867 |
| Cobalt, 842 | Before Weaning, 867 |
| Copper and Molybdenum, 843 | After Weaning, 868 |
| Fluorine, 843 | Feeding Bucks and Pet Goats, 868 |
| Iodine, 843 | Urolithiasis, 869 |
| Iron, 844 | Posthitis, 869 |
| Manganese, 844 | Arthritis, 869 |
| Nickel, 844 | Special Considerations in Feeding Angora and Cashmere |
| Selenium, 844 | Goats, 869 |
| Zinc, 846 | Mohair Production, 869 |
| Water, 847 | Angora Kid Growth, 870 |
| Dry Matter Intake, 848 | Cashmere Production, 871 |
| Forages, 848 | Poisonous Plants and Fungi, 871 |
| Concentrates, 848 Intake Limits, 848 | References, 875 |
Goat Medicine, Third Edition.
Mary C. Smith and David M. Sherman. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2023 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Goat keepers must assimilate much information regarding nutrition to raise healthy, productive animals. At least in the United States, some novice owners begin with absolutely no agricultural background. Their concept of nutrition has been molded by years of simply opening cans or bags of commercial pet food.
As a first step, one needs to learn the various nutritional requirements (i.e., energy, protein, fiber, vitamins, major minerals, trace minerals, and water) for whatever production is to be required of the goat. Types of production include maintenance, growth, finishing, gestation, milk production for raising kids, maximum milk production, and mohair or cashmere production. The educated owner can easily see analogies with regular dog food, puppy chow, and the limited diet necessary to stave off obesity in an older pet. But very rarely are goats fed a commercially prepared complete ration. After all, the importance of the goat in many parts of the world depends on its ability to subsist and produce on whatever grows there. It becomes necessary, then, to learn the nutritional value and relative cost of feeds available locally. This information can be gained from standard references, where concentrates are concerned, but forage quality is highly variable. The American goat keeper must either learn to accurately distinguish different types and maturities of forages, or make use of feed analyses to determine the nutrient content of hays and silages.
Voluntary dry matter intake (DMI) is another important consideration. What is the capacity of the goat to consume various feeds? Even more important, how much can the goat eat without deranging rumen function or the goat's own metabolism? Feeding any ruminant is first and foremost a question of properly feeding a rumen vat full of bacteria and protozoa. The energy, nitrogen, and all other requirements of bacteria must be met, and all nutrients must be provided in suitable proportions and at appropriate intervals to avoid malnutrition of the microbial population or its destruction via rumen acidosis.
The ruminant needs a steady diet; unlike the situation with a monogastric animal (such as humans), it is not enough just to be sure that a certain number of “servings” of hay or grain, energy or protein, have been consumed during one week or even one day. Even the physical form of the feed is important, because grinding and pelleting of forages tend to decrease digestibility by decreasing the time the particles remain in the rumen.As an additional complication, the digestibility of a given feedstuff varies with the energy and protein content of other components of the ration. Also, the energy content of a given feed or ration depends on the production function for which it is to be used. These and other problems give trained nutritionists much to argue about and go far beyond the scope of this book. The current chapter can only offer a brief overview of nutrition, while trying to make the specific requirements of the goat understandable to the veterinarian or owner. As the level of production of the goat increases, the feeding must also be improved, and therefore other sources of information must be consulted to permit fine-tuning of a ration. The nutrient requirements of small ruminants, including goats, have been summarized (NRC 2007). An online ration balancer and calculator for the energy, protein, calcium, and phosphorus needs of the individual animal based on the equations used by the National Research Council (NRC) is also available (Gipson et al. n.d.) and makes the data more accessible to the potential user. A detailed mathematical model, called the Small Ruminant Nutrition System (Tedeschi et al. 2010) and based on the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System, has also been created to predict metabolizable energy, protein, calcium, and phosphorus requirements under various management systems. The computer program has been adapted for goats and is available for purchase through the Texas A&M University.
One final concern is the difference between the nutrient value of the feed offered and of the feed actually consumed (Brown and Weir 1987).
Normal feeding behavior of a goat involves continual picking and choosing. When high production is required, the goat must be allowed enough extra feed that it can choose what it eats. It thereby achieves an increased level of feed intake and a richer ration, but at the expense of leaving perhaps 15-20% of the offered forage in the manger. Knowing the analysis values for a certain alfalfa hay is not the same as knowing the nutrient content of the leaves that were picked one by one off the stems (Morand-Fehr 1981a)! Furthermore, because of normal caprine behavior, the “choosiness” of a goat usually varies with its social status in the herd, unless it is housed and fed individually. The dominant goat in the herd can stand for hours at the manger, eating what it will. Meanwhile, subordinate does and kids have to grab a mouthful and run, or even pick up discarded hay off the floor. Putting enough high-quality forage into the manger to exceed the requirements of all the animals present does not ensure that one or more goats will not die of starvation.