RESISTANT BACTERIA IN AUSTRALIAN MAMMALS
Environmental pollution with antibiotic-resistant bacteria presents concerns for wildlife medicine. Issues include selection of treatment regimens, veterinary hospital- acquired infections and zoonotic transmission.
Further, threats to wildlife health may result from alteration of endemic microbiota through the introduction of genetic material and competition between endemic and invading microbes. Pathogen transfer to immunologically naive individuals may occur in association with wildlife rehabilitation or ex situ breeding, via translocations between facilities and/or release to free-range populations, leading to disease risks that may affect conservation efforts. There are 14 published studies to date in which antibiotic resistance in Australian native mammals has been examined (Table 17.1). Different bacteria, hosts and methods (phenotypic and genetic) for assessing antibiotic resistance have been used in the Australian investigations (Table 17.1).The first study demonstrated low-level widespread resistance among isolates representing seven enteric bacterial species from wildlife hosts across the continent (Sherley et al. 2000). Using the disc diffusion assay, 30 antibiotics with varying activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were tested. Resistance profiles differed between wildlife host taxa, but certain host groups had similar resistance profiles. Bacterial isolates from species in the Families Vespertillionidae, Potoroi- dae, Macropodidae, Phalangeridae and Muridae had similar antibiotic-resistance profiles. Isolates from the Dasyuridae were distinct from other wildlife groups and resistance profiles varied by geographical source (Sherley et al. 2000). Although not measured, antibiotic exposure in different geographical regions was suggested as the
Table 17.1. Published reports of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in Australian native mammals
| Host | Number tested | Population type | Bacterial species (number of isolates) | Isolation site/samples | Resistance phenotype (number of isolates) | Resistance genes/ cassette arrays |
| Black-footed | 30 | FR | Staphylococcus | Nasal swab | AMP:PEN | blaZ, blaR1, bla1 |
| rock-wallaby (Petrogale lateralis)1,2 | aureus (2) S. epidermidis (2) | Nasal swab | AMP:PEN | blaZ, blaR1 | ||
| 5. cohnii (1) | Nasal swab | AMP:OX:PEN:FOX:CTX:E | mecA, SCC mec I | |||
| S. warneri (4) | Nasal swab | AMP:PEN (2) | blaZ, blaR1, bla1 | |||
| AMP:OX:PEN:FOX:CTX:TE:E (2) | mecC, SCC mecV | |||||
| Black-footed | 16 | Z | 5. aureus (2) | Nasal swab | AMP:PEN | blaZ, blaR1, bla1 |
| rock-wallaby1,2 | 5. epidermidis (1) | Nasal swab | NT | |||
| Brush-tailed | 29 | Z | 5. flueretti (4) | Nasal swab | AMP:OX:PEN:FOX:CTX* | mecA |
| rock-wallaby (P. penicillata)1,2 | AMP:OX:PEN:CTX* | |||||
| Yellow-footed | 28 | Z | 5. epidermidis (1) | Nasal swab | AMP:OX:PEN:FOX:CTX* | SCC mec III |
| rock-wallaby (P. xanthopus)1,2 | 5. flueretti (3) | Nasal swab | AMP:OX:PEN:CTX* CTX* | blaZ, blaR1, mecA (1) | ||
| OX | mecA (2) | |||||
| 5. sapropyticus (1) | Nasal swab | AMP:OX:PEN:FOX:E | blaZ, blaR1 | |||
| 5. succinus (1) | Nasal swab | AMP:PEN | blaZ, blaR1 | |||
| Tammar wallaby | 24 | Z | 5. epidermidis (4) | Nasal swab | AMP:PEN (2) | blaZ, blaR1 |
| (Notamacropus | AMP:OX:PEN:FOX (2) | blaZ, blaR1, bla1 | ||||
| eugenii)1,2 | 5. sapropyticus | Nasal swab | AMP:OX:PEN:FOX:E | NT | ||
| 5. succinus | Nasal swab | AMP:OX:PEN:FOX | NT | |||
| Dugong (Dugong dugon)3 | 4 | FR | 5. warneri (2) | Faeces | PEN:TRM | blaZ, dfrC |
| Australian sea- | 19 | Z | Escherichia coli (4) | Faeces | NT | aadA1 (1), dfrB4 (2), |
| lion (Neophoca | aadA∖dfrA17 (1) | |||||
| cinerea)4~6 | 285 | FR | E. coli (3) | Faeces | NT | dfrA5 (2), dfrA7 (1) |
| Australian fur | 394 | FR | E. coli (7) | Faeces | NT | aacA4∖arr3 (2), dfrA14 (1), |
| seal | dfrA17∖aadA5 (1), dfrA7 (3) | |||||
| (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus)6 | ||||||
| Grey-headed | 287 | FR | E. coli (11) | Faeces | AMP(11):AMX(11):AMC(2):CL(2): | aadA1 (1), ampC (1), |
| flying-fox | KZ(2):CTX(2):CFP(2):IPM(1):ME | aph(3")-Ib (2), aph(6)-Id (2), | ||||
| (Pteropus | M(1):C(1):W(3):SXT(3):S(3):SH(1): | blaTEM-1 (10), | ||||
| poliocephalus)7~9 | NA(1):CIP(1):TE(7) | blaCTX-M-27 (1), blaNDM-5 (1), catA2 (1), dfrA14 (3), sul2 (3), tet(A) (6), parC/parE/gyrA (1) | ||||
| 84 | Z | E. coli (51) | Faeces | AMP(51):AMX(51):AMC(16): | aph(3")-Ib (17), aph(6)-Id | |
| CL(6):CTX(6):C(1):W(20): | (17), blaTEM-1 (35), | |||||
| SXT(20):S(17):SH(20):TE(19) | blaTEM-33 (10), blaCMY-2 (6), catA1 (1), dfrA17∖aadA5 (6), dfrA5 (14), sul2 (20), sul3 (1), tet(A) (15), tet(B) (4) | |||||
| 255 | FR | Klebsiella pneumoniae (3) | Faeces | AMP:AMX:NA*:CIP:TRM | blaSHV, drfA14, qnr51 |
1Chen etal.
2015; 2Chen etal. 2016; 3 McGowan etal. 2023; 4Delport etal. 2015. 5Fulham etal. 2018; 6Fulham etal. 2022; 7 McDougall etal. 2021a; 8McDougall etal. 2021b; 9McDougall etal. 2022. Z = zoo-housed; FR = free-ranging; NT = not tested. Antibiotics: AMC = amoxicillin+clavulanic acid; AMP = ampicillin; AMX = amoxicillin; C = chloramphenicol; CFP = cefoperazone; CIP = ciprofloxacin; CL = cephalexin; CTX = cefotaxime; E = erythromycin; FOX = cefoxitin; KZ = cefazolin; IPM = imipenem; MEM = meropenem; NA = naladixic acid; OX = oxacillin; PEN = penicillin, TE = tetracycline; S = streptomycin; SH = spectinomycin; SXT = trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole; W = trimethoprim.intermediate resistance.
driver of variation in resistant profiles observed between hosts, source location and bacterial isolates from similar hosts (Sherley et al. 2000). More recent studies have applied genetic screening, both with and without phenotypic analyses, and revealed the extent that antibiotic resistant bacteria have infiltrated wildlife microbiomes.
4.1 Detection of antibiotic resistance determinants in terrestrial wildlife
The prevalence of class 1 integrons was determined for zoo-housed and free-ranging brush-tailed rock-wallabies (Petrogale penicillata) (Power et al. 2013), grey-headed flying-foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus) (McDougall et al. 2019), and koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) (McDougall et al. 2024). In all three species, the prevalence of class 1 integrons was higher in zoo-housed individuals compared to their free-range counterparts; brush-tailed rockwallabies (free-range 0.0%, zoo-housed 48.3%) (Power et al. 2013), adult grey-headed flying-foxes (free-range 5.3%, zoo-housed 41.2%) (McDougall et al. 2019) and koalas (free-range 0.0%, zoo-housed 46.9%) (McDougall et al. 2024). These class 1 integrons contained diverse genes encoding resistance to narrow-spectrum beta-lactams, trimethoprim and aminoglycosides, and included gene cassette arrays commonly seen in human clinical settings (Power et al.
2013; McDougall et al. 2019; McDougall et al. 2024). The zoo-housed brush-tailed rock-wallabies were part of a conservation breeding program and all were used to supplement a free-ranging population (Power et al. 2013), and the grey-headed flying-foxes and koalas were undergoing rehabilitation for subsequent release back into the free-range populations (McDougall et al. 2019; McDougall et al. 2024). The prevalence of class 1 integrons in the microbiomes of Australian mammals was positively correlated with proximity to humans.Resistance genes to chloramphenicol (cat genes) and tetracycline/doxycycline (tet genes) have been detected in the urogenital and faecal microbiomes of free-range and zoo-housed koalas (McDougall et al. 2023). Chloramphenicol and doxycycline are critical for the treatment of chlamydial disease in koalas, and the presence of resistance bacteria may contribute to negative treatment outcomes for koalas receiving anti-chlamydial antibiotics (McDougall et al. 2023).
4.2 Case examples of antibiotic resistant bacteria in wildlife
Resistance to the extended spectrum β-lactams and methicillin has been identified in Gram-positive bacteria associated with the respiratory system of zoo-housed and free-ranging groups of black-footed rock-wallaby (P. lateralis), yellow-footed rock-wallaby (P. xanthopus) and the tammar wallaby (Notamacropus eugenii) in SA. Four Staphylococcus spp. showed phenotypic resistance to ampicillin, penicillin, oxacillin and cefoxitin and genetic analyses revealed the presence of resistance genes (bla and mecA genes) in the isolated staphylococcal species (Chen et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2016). MDR strains were also detected (Table 17.1).
In grey-headed flying-foxes antimicrobial resistant E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were detected in free- range and zoo-housed/rehabilitation (Table 17.1). Klebsiella species are intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics, including penicillin, amoxicillin and ticarcillin. Most Klebsiella species are susceptible to aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, trimethoprim/sulphonamide, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins and carbapenems (Stock and Wiedemann 2001; Bouza and Cercenado 2002). In free- range habitats the prevalence of amoxicillin-resistant E. coli was lower (3.5%) in adult grey-headed flying-fox compared to zoo-housed bats or those undergoing rehabilitation (McDougall et al. 2021a; McDougall et al. 2022). In zoos, whether transient or long-term the prevalence was significantly higher in adults (6.5%) and pups (77.4%) (McDougall et al. 2021a; McDougall et al. 2022). A proportion of amoxicillin-resistant E. coli isolates (54.8%) exhibited multidrug resistance to key antimicrobials including cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim plus sulphonamide, tetracyclines, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. Fluoroquinolone- and trimethoprim-resistant K. pneumoniae were also detected in free-ranging adults (McDougall et al. 2021b). The majority of the amoxicillinresistant E. coli isolates (56.5%) in the study were classified as extraintestinal pathogenic strains and phylogenies indicated that all resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae were anthropogenic in origin. Resistant bacteria have also been detected in other flying-fox species. A case of Streptococcus group F isolated from a black flying-fox (P. alecto) tracheal swab was resistant to enrofloxacin, tetracycline and mar- bofloxacin was reported to the Wildlife Health Information System (eWHIS) (Grillo et al. 2015).
Reports of other cases of antibiotic resistant bacteria in eWHIS include (Grillo et al. 2015). Resistant Klebsiella isolates were detected in a koala blood sample and an eastern grey kangaroo (Macropus giganteus) faecal sample. The Klebsiella spp. isolated from the kangaroo and koala were MDR, with both resistant to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, doxycycline, trimethoprim/ sulfonamide, marbofloxacin, enrofloxacin and ceftazidime and ceftiofur (3rd- and 4th-generation cephalosporins, respectively). The Klebsiella sp. isolated from a koala blood sample was also resistant to amikacin and neomycin. Additionally, resistant Enterobacter gergoviae and Staphylococcus sp. isolated have been reported to eWHIS from koalas (various samples) (Grillo et al. 2015).
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria have also been reported in marsupials held in zoos outside of Australia. Bacteria isolated from the conjunctiva of red kangaroos (Osphranter rufus) were resistant to multiple antibiotics among a panel of 23 compounds. Resistance to β-lactams and cephalosporins was most frequent and the prevalence of resistance was quite high for ophthalmic antibiotics; 70.8% of isolates were resistant to bacitracin and 41.7% to both ticarcillin and polymixin B (Takle et al. 2010). The most common bacteria among the resistant isolates were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Corynebacterium spp.
The dissemination of antibiotic resistant bacteria extends to Australia’s marine wildlife. Escherchia coli carrying class 1 integrons have been identified in zoo-housed Australian sea-lions (Neophoca cinerea) (Delport et al. 2015) and in free-range Australian sea-lion and Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) pups (Fulham et al. 2018; Fulham et al. 2022) (Table 17.1). DNA sequencing of integron cassette arrays identified genes that confer resistance to aminoglycosides, trimethoprim and rifampin (Table 17.1). Trimethoprim resistant Staph. warner i has been detected in faecal samples from dugongs (Dugong dugon) (McGowan et al. 2023) (Table 17.1). Enterococcus faecium isolated from a male juvenile long-nosed fur seal (A. fosteri) in NSW displayed resistance to vancomycin in culture and was vanB positive by PCR (P Thompson, L Vogelnest, pers. comm.).
5.