Summary of Antimicrobial Therapy
Judicious antibiotic use is necessary for successful mastitis treatment programs. Case selection is critically important to avoid unnecessary antibiotic use, which is costly to the producer and of concern to the public.
When producers are unwilling or unable to use culture results as the basis for treatment determination, a decision may be necessary to avoid treatment completely or, alternatively, to treat all cows empirically. Antibiotic selection and the timing, dose, frequency, and duration of treatment affect the outcome. Therefore antibiotic treatment protocols should be designed with veterinary input and monitored for efficacy. Monitoring requires that farm personnel record the incidence, severity, and duration of clinical mastitis, as well as the treatments administered. The occurrence of relapses, SCCs, and targeted milk bacteriology also facilitate assessment of treatment efficacy.MASTITIS THERAPY: SUPPORTIVE TREATMENT. A variety of supportive measures are used in cows with severe clinical mastitis, often in conjunction with antibiotic therapy. Fluids and electrolytes are administered to correct circulatory and electrolyte disturbances (also see Chapter 44). Steroidal and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents are used to reduce pain, inflammation, and fever. Dairy producers and veterinarians use many other systemic and local treatments, most of which have not been scientifically evaluated or shown to be effective. This section discusses the most frequently used supportive treatments.
Fluid and Electrolyte Therapy. Cows with severe clinical mastitis can develop fluid and electrolyte disturbances as a result of decreased feed and water intake, rumen stasis, ileus, and diarrhea. Severely affected cows, particularly those with coliform mastitis, may develop septic or endotoxic shock; death or organ damage can result from decreased effective circulating volume.
The hydration status of an adult cow is assessed subjectively by observing skin tent duration on the neck or eyelid and position of the globe in the orbit. Unfortunately, findings can be influenced by the body condition of the cow. Objective criteria for estimating the extent of dehydration have been reported for dairy calves but have not been established for adult cows.447 Extrapolating from calves, a healthy cow should have cervical skin tenting of 2 seconds or less and no recession of the eyeball. Skin tent durations of 4, 6, or 8 seconds and eyeball recession of 2, 4, or 7 mm would correlate with 4%, 8%, and 12% dehydration, respectively. Indicators of reduced peripheral perfusion are cold extremities (ears, tail, fetlocks— only reliable at moderate ambient temperatures) and a dry muzzle or mouth.448 Hematocrit and plasma protein concentration are not reliable indicators of hydration status in an individual cow because of the wide range of normal values and the effects of inflammation and stage of lactation on total protein concentration.
Most cows with clinical mastitis, even severe mastitis, have normal acid-base balance or metabolic alkalosis; metabolic acidosis is uncommon and associated with a poor prognosis.441,449 Therefore there is no need for routine IV administration of alkalizing agents, such as bicarbonate or lactate. Also, oral products containing magnesium hydroxide or sodium bicarbonate should not be administered.
Fluids can be administered by the oral (intraruminal) or IV route. The oral route is least expensive and is often adequate for cows with mild to moderate dehydration. Oral fluids should be hypotonic or isotonic and should contain sodium, to create an osmotic gradient between rumen fluid and blood and enable sustained absorption of fluid and electrolytes; hypertonic oral fluids should be avoided.450 A 600-kg cow that is 6% dehydrated needs to absorb 36 L of fluid to replace her deficit.
This volume can be safely administered orally, but administration of larger volumes of hypotonic fluid may lead to intravascular hemolysis.451 Oral fluids are not sufficient for cows with severe dehydration because they do not cause rapid resuscitation.Ringer's solution, which is an isotonic (isosmotic), mildly acidifying solution that contains physiologic concentrations of sodium, chloride, potassium, and calcium, is the fluid of choice for rapid IV resuscitation of adult ruminants.450 Isosmotic (0.9%) sodium chloride is an alternative that can easily be constituted using table salt and distilled water in a sterile carboy. However, administration of isosmotic crystalloid solutions is impractical in many situations because of the large volume of fluid required and the need for IV catheterization. A 600-kg cow that is 10% dehydrated requires 60 L of fluid to replace her deficit.
A more practical alternative for on-farm therapy to isosmotic IV fluid therapy is IV administration of hypertonic (7.2%, 2460 mOsm/L) saline. Hypertonic saline is administered through a large-bore needle at 4 to 5 mL/kg body weight over 4 to 5 minutes, in conjunction with oral administration of water (5 gal). Rapid administration of hypertonic saline is required to effectively create an osmotic gradient that draws fluid from the intercellular spaces and gastrointestinal tract (mainly rumen) into the vasculature. Although hypertonic saline does not have a sustained effect and will not completely correct a large fluid deficit, it rapidly increases plasma volume and improves cardiac output and tissue perfusion. Hypertonic saline has been shown 452 453
to be safe in cows with endotoxic mastitis.4,
Mild to moderate hypocalcemia often accompanies clinical mastitis, with the odds of hypocalcemia increasing with the severity of mastitis,145 although other serum electrolytes are variable. Affected cows may show muscle tremors or weakness but are seldom recumbent.
Calcium supplementation can be by the oral, subcutaneous (SC), or slow IV route, depending on the severity of clinical signs and the product used. Anorexic cows often become hypokalemic, especially if anorexia persists for several days. Hypertonic saline administration also causes a transient reduction in serum potassium concentration. Potassium chloride can be supplemented orally at a rate of up to 240 g divided two to three times daily, with lesser amounts (30 to 120 g) being satisfactory for mild to moderate hypoka- lemia.454 Sodium and chloride derangements are usually mild and can be addressed by administering balanced oral or IV fluids or hypertonic saline. Blood glucose concentration is usually normal or high in cows with clinical mastitis, so dextrose should not be administered routinely. However, IV dextrose treatment may be warranted in cows with concurrent ketosis.Anti-inflammatory Drugs. Most of the physiologic and pathologic changes associated with clinical mastitis are a result of the inflammatory response to infection. Therefore it is logical to administer anti-inflammatory agents. Also, anti-inflammatory agents can reduce the pain associated with clinical mastitis.455 However, the inflammatory response is necessary for resolving intramammary infection, and anti-inflammatory agents can produce detrimental side effects. Many of the agents used in other countries are not labeled for use in lactating dairy cows in the United States. The choice of anti-inflammatory agents in the United States is limited to three approved drugs— dexamethasone, isoflupredone acetate, and flunixin meglumine— although none is approved for the treatment of severe clinical mastitis.
Dexamethasone and isoflupredone acetate are inexpensive steroidal anti-inflammatory agents that have no milkwithholding requirement. Glucocorticoid drugs inhibit the production of inflammatory molecules and the adhesion molecules that facilitate transport of inflammatory cells from the bloodstream to the site of inflammation.
Glucocorticoids also help to maintain microcirculation and cell membrane integrity, interfere with dissolution and disruption of connective tissue, decrease formation of histamine by injured cells, and antagonize toxins and kinins. These actions of glucocorticoid drugs could be expected to benefit mastitic cows, particularly those with mastitis caused by endotoxin-producing coliform bacteria. Glucocorticoids prevent arachidonic acid release by stabilizing cell membranes and by inducing lipocortin production. Lipocortin prevents phospholipase A2 from contacting cell membrane-associated arachidonic acid and effectively limits the precursor needed for eicosanoid production.456 In addition, endogenous cortisol release has been identified as playing an important role in downregulating neutrophil trafficking into the site of infection and production of inflammatory cytokines.68Data on the efficacy of steroidal anti-inflammatory agents for treatment of clinical mastitis are limited to experimental mastitis trials. A single, 30-mg IM dose of dexamethasone given at the time of E. coli inoculation reduced local signs of inflammation, tachycardia, rumen motility impairment, and 14-day milk production loss, compared with untreated controls.457,458 A large IV dose of dexamethasone (0.44 mg/kg) given to goats 12 hours after E. coli infusion reduced fever and appetite suppression but had no effect on heart rate, rumen contractions, serum biochemical parameters, SCCs, milk yield, or histopathologic changes.459 Isoflupredone acetate (20 mg IV) administered to endotoxin-challenged cows after the onset of clinical mastitis had no beneficial effect on systemic parameters, mammary gland swelling, or milk production, compared with untreated controls.460
However, each of these agents has potential adverse effects. Dexamethasone can cause abortion in pregnant cows, especially after 5 months of gestation, although this would be less of a concern for cows in early lactation.
Repeated dosing (0.04 mg/kg IM for 3 days) of cows with subclinical intramammary infections resulted in increased bacterial shedding and development of clinical mastitis.461 Perhaps more problematic is the use of isoflupredone acetate because this drug reduces plasma potassium concentration and repeated doses can lead to severe hypokalemia and recumbency.462-464The above studies suggest that the most likely benefit for corticosteroid treatment would be for severe coliform mastitis, and delays in therapy relative to the onset of infection may hamper efficacy. Nonetheless, dexamethasone is a potent anti-inflammatory agent, and it is difficult to extrapolate the benefit for cattle in terms of improved attitude and shock mitigation from experimental mastitis trials to naturally occurring clinical mastitis. Because of mineral corticoid effects on serum potassium, dexamethasone may be preferred over iso- flupredone. In addition, corticosteroid use in chronic IMI should be contraindicated.
A variety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to treat clinical mastitis worldwide.455 However, only flunixin meglumine is approved for use in lactating dairy cows in the United States. Dipyrone and phenylbutazone are banned, and other NSAIDs can be used in an extralabel manner only if appropriately justified. The NSAIDs are not immunosuppressive but carry a risk of abomasal ulceration and renal damage. These complications are not well documented in cattle and presumably are minimized if treatment is of short duration, hydration is maintained, and appetite is restored. The primary mode of action of NSAIDs is to inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes by inhibition of cyclooxygenase. NSAIDs also inhibit the formation of prostaglandin E2 in the brain, which effectively reduces fever.465
Treatment of cows with flunixin meglumine at 0 and 3 to 5 hours after E. coli inoculation abolished fever and improved rumen motility, compared with untreated controls, but had no effect on gland or milk appearance, heart rate, or respiratory rate.466 Similarly, administration of flunixin meglumine every 8 hours beginning 2 hours after endotoxin infusion reduced fever and improved gland appearance and attitude, compared with untreated controls, but had no effect on milk appearance, heart rate, rumen motility, SCC, or milk production.467 When administered after the onset of fever and gland swelling, flunixin meglumine (2.2 mg/kg IV) reduced heart rate and rectal temperature and increased rumen motility in cows with endotoxic mastitis but had no effect on milk production or mammary gland inflammation.468 As with the steroids, the relevance of these trial results to cows with naturally occurring clinical mastitis is uncertain. Meloxicam, administered at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg subcutaneously, was found to have a beneficial effect in relieving pain, decreasing udder edema, and reducing body temperature response following an LPS-induced clinical mastitis.468a Although not labelled for use in cattle in the United States, this drug may have potential in the future for analgesia and as an anti-inflammatory agent. It appears that NSAIDs can improve well-being and outcome in cows with clinical mastitis. However, specific criteria for instituting NSAID therapy, the timing of therapy relative to infection onset, and the optimal duration of treatment remain to be determined.
Oxytocin and Frequent Milking. Oxytocin is administered to stimulate milk ejection and facilitate removal of secretions from mastitic mammary glands. Frequent milk-out (stripping) reputedly augments the removal of pathogens, toxins, and inflammatory mediators from the mammary gland. Although these are seemingly logical practices, no solid evidence exists to support their routine use, and some data suggest they can be detrimental. Oxytocin (20 IU IM twice daily for 3 days) at milking time prevented development of clinical mastitis in only two of eight cows experimentally inoculated with S. uberis; once clinical mastitis developed, oxytocin was ineffective at resolving the S. uberis infections.469 When initiated at the onset of clinical S. uberis mastitis, oxytocin (80 IU IM, followed by 20 IU IM twice daily) resulted in no clinical or bacteriologic cures by 3 or 6 days.470 In contrast, clinical and bacteriologic cure rates of 91% and 64% were achieved by intramammary antibiotic administration by 3 and 6 days, respectively. When oxytocin was used in conjunction with intramammary antibiotics, clinical and bacteriologic cure rates at 6 days dropped to 10%, implying a significant adverse effect of oxytocin and stripping. Frequent milk-out (every 4 to 6 hours) in conjunction with oxytocin administration did not shorten the time to clinical or bacteriologic cure or resolution of systemic illness in cows with experimentally induced coliform mastitis, compared with no treatment.471 When oxytocin administration (100 IU IM twice daily for 1 week) was compared with no treatment (udder massage only) in cows experimentally inoculated with S. aureus, oxytocin administration reduced bacterial concentrations in the milk but did not improve the bacteriologic cure rate or reduce SCCs.472 Oxytocin administration increases the permeability of mammary epithelial tight cell junctions in a dosedependent manner, which can alter milk composition in nonmastitic glands, particularly if high doses (100 IU) are administered repeatedly.473
Oxytocin and frequent milk-out have not been evaluated extensively in the field. In a California study, oxytocin (100 IU IM twice daily for three treatments) at milking time resulted in similar clinical and bacteriologic cure rates, as compared to intramammary antibiotics, although an untreated control group was not evaluated.474 However, no overall benefit resulted because the oxytocin-treated cows had a higher recurrence rate of clinical mastitis, particularly environmental streptococcal mastitis.475 In a Virginia study, frequent milk-out (six times daily) in conjunction with oxytocin administration (20 IU) did not improve clinical or bacteriologic cure rates, time to cure, or return to milk production compared with no treatment.471 In an Illinois herd, cows treated with supportive therapy alone (oxytocin administration [all cases], frequent milk-out [moderate and severe cases], anti-inflammatory therapy [severe cases], and fluid therapy [severe cases]) had lower clinical and bacteriologic cure rates and a higher recurrence rate than cows given antibiotics in addition to the same supportive therapy.444 Furthermore, two studies have cited that 50 IU of oxytocin administered q12h for 19 or 22 days increased residual (nonharvested) milk by 15% at each milking.476,477 Bruckmaier476 noted, “Cows increasingly refused to enter the milking parlor voluntarily and had to be fetched by the milker and cow entry into the parlor remained disturbed for up to one week after the end of injections.”
In summary, oxytocin administration and frequent milk-out are not likely to be effective standalone treatments for clinical mastitis, particularly mastitis caused by streptococci, and may even be detrimental. In certain circumstances, when a cow clearly will not eject milk or when garget in the milk prevents effective milk removal, these practices may be of some benefit. Otherwise, unnecessary administration of oxytocin injections and frequent milking of painful teats should be avoided for welfare reasons. Sustained use of this drug as a routine therapy is a poor substitute for good milking preparation and will likely incite cows to be reluctant to enter the milking parlor and milk out effectively, which is the opposite of therapeutic intentions with this drug.