<<
>>

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andersen ML, Winter LMF. Animal models in biological and biomedical research - experimental and ethical concerns. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017;91(Suppl 1):e20170238.

Barraza-Flores P, Fontelonga TM, Wuebbles RD, Hermann HJ, Nunes AM, Kornegay JN, et al.

Laminin-111 protein ther­apy enhances muscle regeneration and repair in the GRMD dog model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(16):2686-95.

Barre-Sinoussi F, Montagutelli X. Animal models are essential to biological research: issues and perspectives. Future Sci OA. 2015;1(4)

Bertoloni MD. Early modern experimentation on live animals. J Hist Biol. 2013; 46:199-226.

Carroll RG. Using animals in teaching: APS position statement and rationale. Physiologist 2005;48:206-8.

Cheng L, Liu Y, Zhao H, Zhang W, Guo Y-J, Nie L. Lentiviral- mediated transfer of CDNF promotes nerve regeneration and functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury in adult rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;440(2):330-5.

Cook J, Fox D, Malaviya P, Tomlinson J, Farr J, Kuroki K, et al. Evaluation of small intestinal submucosa grafts for menis­cal regeneration in a clinically relevant posterior meniscec­tomy model in dogs. J Knee Surg. 2006;19(3):159-67.

Dam DV, Deyn PPD. Animal models in the drug discov­ery pipeline for Alzheimer’s disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164(4):1285-300.

Ernst W. Humanized mice in infectious diseases. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;49:29-38.

Farah Z, Fan H, Liu Z, He J-Q. A concise review of com­mon animal models for the study of limb regeneration. Organogenesis. 2016;12(3):109-18.

Fitzpatrick N, Smith TJ, Pendegrass CJ, Yeadon R, Ring M, Goodship AE, et al. Intraosseous transcutaneous amputa­tion prosthesis (ITAP) for limb salvage in 4 Dogs. Vet Surg. 2011;40(8):909-25.

Gad SC. Animal models in toxicology. In: Wexler P, editor. Encyclopedia of toxicology.

Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 138-40.

Gutpell KM, Hrinivich WT, Hofman LM. Skeletal muscle fbrosis in mouse validates its suitability as a murine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0117306.

Hansen LA, Boss GR. Use of live animals in the curricula of U.S. Medical schools: Survey results from 2001. Acad Med. 2002;77:1147-9.

Heber-Katz E, Leferovich JM, Bedelbaeva K, Gourevitch D. Spallanzani’s mouse: a model of restoration and regenera­tion. In: Heber-Katz E, editor. Regeneration: stem cells and beyond. Berlin: Springer; 2004. p. 165-89.

Leppik LP, Froemel D, Slavici A, Ovadia ZN, Hudak L, Henrich D, et al. Efects of electrical stimulation on rat limb regener­ation, a new look at an old model. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):18353. Lewis DI. The pedagogical benefits and pitfalls of virtual tools for teaching and learning laboratory practices in the biological sciences. Heslington and New York, UK: The Higher Education Academy, STEM; 2014.

Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30:159-67.

Modell HI. Can technology replace live preparations in student laboratories? Am J Physiol. 1989;256:S18-20.

Monamy V. Animal experimentation: a guide to the issues. Cambridge University Press; 2009.

Moran CJ, Ramesh A, Brama PAJ, O'Byrne JM, O'Brien FJ, Levingstone TJ. The benefts and limitations of animal models for translational research in cartilage repair. J Exp Orthop. 2016;3(1):1.

Oakley J. Science teachers and the dissection debate: Perspectives on animal dissection and alternatives. Inter J Environ Sci Educ. 2012;7:253-67.

Oliveira KMC, Barker JH, Berezikov E, Pindur L, Kynigopoulos S, Eischen, Loges M, et al. Electrical stimulation shifts healing/scarring towards regeneration in a rat limb amputa­tion model. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11433.

Oparin AI. The origin of life on the earth. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press Inc.; 1957.

Pehlivanovic B, Dina F, Emina A, Ziga Smajic N, Fahir B.

Animal models in modern biomedical research. Eur J Pharm Med Res. 2019;6(7):35-8.

Quiroga MD, Choate JK. A virtual experiment improved students' understanding of physiological experimental processes ahead of a live inquiry-based practical class. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019;43:495-503.

Ra'anan AW. The evolving role of animal laboratories in physiol­ogy instruction. Adv Physiol Educ. 2005;29:144-50.

Raske M, McClaran JK, Mariano A. Short-term wound com­plications and predictive variables for complication after limb amputation in dogs and cats. J Small Anim Pract. 2015;56(4):247-52

Simmons D. The use of animal models in studying genetic disease: transgenesis and induced mutation. Nat Educ. 2008;1(1):70. Simon F, Oberhuber A, Schelzig H. Advantages and disadvan­tages of different animal models for studying ischemia/ reperfusion injury of the spinal cord. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(6):744.

Thaman RG, Saggar S, Kaur H, Dhillon S, Gupta S, Kaur P, et al. Neuromuscular physiology experiments: Computer assisted learning versus traditional lecture demonstrations. Pak J Physiol. 2012;8:28-32

Udovic D, Morris D, Dickman A, Postlethwait J, Wetherwax P. Workshop biology: Demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. Bioscience 2002;52:272-81.

Zaccagnini G, Gaetano C, Della Pietra L, Nanni S, Grasselli A, Mangoni A, et al. Telomerase mediates vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent responsiveness in a rat model of hind limb ischemia. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(15):14790-8.

Zaccagnini G, Palmisano A, Canu T, Maimone B, Russo FML, Ambrogi F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging allows the evaluation of tissue damage and regeneration in a mouse model of critical limb ischemia. PLoS One. 2015;10(11). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142111

<< | >>
Source: Rana Tanmoy (ed.). Principles of Veterinary Animal Physiology. CRC Press,2026. — 290 p.. 2026

More on the topic BIBLIOGRAPHY: